.jpg)
%20(f).jpg)
Reader Patrick Farrell pointed me in the direction of an internet newspaper archive, and specifically, columns in some of the Florida papers on May 11, 1967.
Below is the transactions column from the Sarasota Herald-Tribune on May 11, 1967, which lists the players released or sent down as all teams scrambled to get down to the 25-man limit that late into the season. I wonder why this wasn't required by opening day? Does anyone have insight into this?
In my earlier review of the Phillies, I also noticed that they seem to have had 26 players on their roster in the early months, before Tito Francona was sold.
2 comments:
Best as I recall, this was a practice to allow some players to heal, or others to prove themselves. Bad weather, early season injuries and the like could mean a need for an extra player or two, and so the rosters were - I think - 27 for the first month, then there was a cut-down to 25. Then, of course, the roster opened up Sept. 1. Not sure when this ended, but I think it was when baseball briefly tried to go to 23 and 24 man rosters in the '80s.
Ironically, I just read about this in Bobby Murcer's autobiography. He did not give a reason, but he recalled that when he made the Yankees in 1966, it was a 28-man roster that was cut down to 25 on May 1st.
Post a Comment